PUBLICATIONS

The Center for Judicial Excellence (CJE) recently generated a report, Child Safety First, that claims to have uncovered a crisis that is indicative of systemic problems in the family court system and that places countless children at risk each year. Based on the Center’s non-peer-reviewed research, CJE proposes that significant changes are needed in the […]

This document is an analysis of a report published by the Human Rights Council of the United Nations on April 13, 2023, i.e., “Custody, violence against women and violence against children: Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls, its causes and consequences, Reem Alsalem” (subsequently referred to as “the Report”). The

This document is a comprehensive analysis and critique of the book, Challenging Parental Alienation: New Directions for Professionals and Parents, copyright 2022, edited by Jean Mercer and Margaret Drew. The book was published by Routledge, an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, a large company in London and New York. The initial purpose of our

 The realization of the analysis that is presented concludes with the recommendation of the immediate withdrawal of the book by the Editor. This recommendation comes from the findings of the analysis because, throughout the entire work, erroneous information was found as a result of the exclusive consultation of secondary sources, ignorance of the original sources,

CONCLUSIONS: The recurring identification of scientific fraud in the field of study of parental alienation makes it clear that it is not a theoretical disagreement or opinions between authors, but a serious problem of research malpractice that has escalated to the degree of denialism of the science, which has compromised the institutional actions of national

Several studies regarding research integrity in the subject of parental alienation appeared recently, what they found was a number of publications with severe errors such as falsification of data, adulteration of original sources, and defamation for which, once the retraction requests were formulated, there were no appropriated mechanisms nor scientific criteria observed, the complaints were